Hi Bernadette - thanks for inviting me to the Grizedale summit. I enjoyed it - an interesting set of people, tho I am not entirely at home in an academic talking shop. I wasn't totally convinced by Grizedale Arts, and have pulled no punches in my critique. Be it understood however that this an argument, inviting counter-argument. with all good wishes - Matthew
THE GRIZEDALE PROJECT
This strikes me as very experimental. So was the original Grizedale
forest sculpture project of 1968.
This project, Grizedale 1 for short, has undoubtedly run its
course. Indeed it had a built-in obsolescence since the sculpture
used primarily found materials - wind, water, stone, wood, leaf
litter - which naturally decay.
Yet what I might call Grizedale 2 seems to define itself in
opposition to Grizedale 1, as being everything that Grizedale 1 is
not. That was Art to improve the quality of life (or whatever the
phrase was), and aimed primarily at visitors. These are disparaged.
Grizedale 2 seems to be wary of Art and of any definition of what
art is or what it does, to be dubious of the word improvement, and
to scorn visitors in favour of villagers.
But art does improve the quality of life, however you define those
words. Why be shy about it? And visitors have largely defined the
quality of Lake District life since 1750. Why scorn them? Ruskin,
Collingwood, Rawnsley, Arthur Ransome, Beatrix Potter, Wainwright -
all visitors. It would be interesting to know how many present-day
Coniston villagers came here originally as visitors.
I would like to see the achievement of Grizedale 1 given its due,
and to see Grizedale 2 build upon it - in a new direction by all
means - rather than set itself up in a separate kingdom in
opposition to it. I have seen this happen before, to the detriment
of the whole, at Dartington. There the placing of departments into
separate kingdoms, each upon its own hill, was highly symbolic of
the fragmentation of the college ethos. Do we see the same thing
happening here?
Grizedale 2 seems to depend almost entirely on the enterprise and
ideas of the director, Adam, who cheerfully acknowledged past
failures but given a long rope may well bring off a triumphant
success here. But the direction and focus, and even definition of
purpose, are not there yet. A negative definition, as I have
suggested above, is not enough.
It is interesting that Grizedale 2 is ambitiously international in
scope, and yet at the same time intensely local. This duality can
be compared with two of the most interesting artists that have
fetched up in Cumbria, Kurt Schwitters and Li Yuan Chia. Li in
particular created a place and whole environment for others to work
creatively, in any medium, and to exhibit their work.
Social Change and Sustainable Development. Good food improves the
quality of life. Sustainable development improves the quality of
food. Social change is, we hope, in a positive direction i.e. an
improvement. Is food production an artistic endeavour? Maybe some
redefining of boundaries is called for here - or maybe it is best
to get on with it and worry about definitions and boundaries
later.
website design & build by theusefularts.org.
1 Comment
I think Grizedale 1 has been given rather more than its dues - Grizedale 2 was a response to it, led by artists keen to distance themselves from the former work. We are currently in Grizedale 3 (for the past 5 years) which is not anti visitor it is anti the exploitation of the visitor and the consequent exploitation by the visitor - the antagonistic and traditional form of tourism promoted by development agencies. The historic precedents of Ruskin et al illustrate an embedded relationship to place which Grizedale 3 follows - engaging with visitors to participate, to build a culture.
I could easily argue that Grizedale 1 was the negative response to place - denying the real richness of rural culture in favour of a sugar coated vision of rural tweeness - still very apparent today as a monocultural approach to landscape and rural culture.
I would also point out that failure in terms of Grizedale 2 is relative - those 'failures' produced the generation of artists now centre stage in the art world - an achievement that G1 did not manage.
Anonymous, June 9, 2012 09:34